What are the Critical Components of Psychological Approaches for Treating Pain?
In the world of pain management, psychological approaches are often framed as competing options:
Which is better?
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)?
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)?
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT)?
Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT)?
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)?
While these approaches differ in focus and philosophy, the truth is there’s significant overlap in the techniques they use. A Delphi study published in the European Journal of Pain set out to identify the key components that make psychological interventions effective in chronic pain management programs—bridging the gap between these various methodologies and finding the common ground.
Key Ingredients: Psychological Treatment in Pain Management Programs
Methods:
This Delphi study led by Louise Sharpe at the University of Sydney aimed to reach a consensus among experts on the essential psychological components of chronic pain management programs. A Delphi approach is often used for exploring complex issues where evidence has been inconsistent.
Researchers reviewed RCTs on psychological treatments for chronic pain and came up with 49 potential strategies, then worked with 42 experts from research and clinical fields to narrow them down. After two rounds of surveys, they agreed on the most essential strategies by keeping anything rated “necessary” by 70% or more of the group. Here is a bit more detail on the process:
Literature Review: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on psychological interventions for chronic pain was performed to identify a comprehensive list of 49 treatment components. These components formed the basis for the Delphi process.
Selection of Participants: Participants included 74 researchers who had conducted RCTs on chronic pain and clinicians from pain management programs. In total, 42 participants, representing diverse geographic and professional backgrounds, completed the process.
Rounds of Surveys:
Round 1: Experts rated each treatment component as "necessary," "desirable," "unnecessary," "potentially harmful," or "unsure." Open-ended responses allowed participants to suggest additional strategies.
Round 2: Components reaching a consensus threshold of 70% as "necessary" were retained. Feedback from Round 1 guided additional refinement and discussion.
Consensus Determination: The process aimed to establish agreement on core strategies for psychological pain management while capturing insights from both research and clinical expertise.
While not as robust as findings gleaned from experimental approaches like RCTs, findings are useful in bringing us closer to an understanding of the most commonly used and effective (based on clinician and researcher opinion) psychologically-informed approaches for treating pain. It is notable that recipients of treatment/people did not appear to be included as experts in this Delphi study. Moving forward, the expertise of the recipients receiving treatment may further guide our insights about the most effective treatment components.
What Are the Most Critical Components of Psychological Approaches?
Findings: Experts (clinicians & researchers) from across Australia, identified the following components as essential for effective psychological interventions in the treatment of pain:
Psychoeducation
Educating patients about pain mechanisms and the cognitive role in chronic pain was deemed essential. Understanding these connections empowers patients to shift harmful thought patterns.
Increasing Activity
Strategies such as graded activity exposure, pacing, and goal-setting encourage patients to engage in activities incrementally, reducing avoidance behaviors that perpetuate pain.
Cognitive Approaches
Strategies to address beliefs about pain and recovery were highlighted for their ability to help patients address negative beliefs and emotions associated with pain.
Other desirable strategies included Relaxation Strategies (mindfulness & stress management) as well as conversations about Managing Set Backs. However, the three components above were universally deemed necessary for effective interventions.
Clinical Implications for Rehabilitation Professional
These findings emphasize a tailored approach to pain management that considers...
Unified Principles: While various psychologically informed approaches exist, the components of psycho-education, facilitating activity engagement, and integrating cognitive strategies are often included across approaches.
Individualized Plans: Each patient’s pain experience is unique. Interventions and combinations of approaches used should align with the client’s goals, preferences, and readiness to engage with these components.
Skills Development: Clinicians from all backgrounds would benefit from training in evidence-based techniques such as CBT, Graded Exposure, and Pain Neuroscience Education to effectively address the psychological components of the pain experience.
Want to deepen your understanding and gain practical tools for these approaches? Our courses are designed to help you upskill, integrate these methods into your practice, and provide the best possible care for your patients. Join us to take the next step in advancing your clinical expertise!
Get started!
Join us: CBT for Pain: The Essentials
OR DIVE DEEP
Get it all in CBT for Distressing Physical Symptoms
Login or sign up to start learningLogin to start learning
